This article is freely available to all

Article Abstract

Objective: A systematic review on S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) for treatment of neuropsychiatric conditions and comorbid medical conditions.

Data Sources: Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases between July 15, 2015, and September 28, 2016, by combining search terms for SAMe (s-adenosyl methionine or s-adenosyl-l-methionine) with terms for relevant disease states (major depressive disorder, MDD, depression, perinatal depression, human immunodeficiency virus, HIV, Parkinson’s , Alzheimer’s , dementia, anxiety, schizophrenia, psychotic, 22q11.2, substance abuse, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, hepatitis, or cirrhosis). Additional studies were identified from prior literature. Ongoing clinical trials were identified through clinical trial registries.

Study Selection: Of the 174 records retrieved, 21 were excluded, as they were not original investigations. An additional 21 records were excluded for falling outside the scope of this review. Of the 132 studies included in this review, 115 were clinical trials and 17 were preclinical studies.

Data Extraction: A wide range of studies was included in this review to capture information that would be of interest to psychiatrists in clinical practice.

Results: This review of SAMe in the treatment of major depressive disorder found promising but limited evidence of efficacy and safety to support its use as a monotherapy and as an augmentation for other antidepressants. Additionally, preliminary evidence suggests that SAMe may ameliorate symptoms in certain neurocognitive, substance use, and psychotic disorders and comorbid medical conditions.

Conclusions: S-adenosylmethionine holds promise as a treatment for multiple neuropsychiatric conditions, but the body of evidence has limitations. The encouraging findings support further study of SAMe in both psychiatric and comorbid medical illnesses.

‘ ‹’ ‹

S-Adenosylmethionine (SAMe) for Neuropsychiatric Disorders:

A Clinician-Oriented Review of Research

Vertical divider

ABSTRACT

Objective: A systematic review on S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) for treatment of neuropsychiatric conditions and comorbid medical conditions.

Data Sources: Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases between July 15, 2015, and September 28, 2016, by combining search terms for SAMe (s-adenosyl methionine or s-adenosyl-l-methionine) with terms for relevant disease states (major depressive disorder, MDD, depression, perinatal depression, human immunodeficiency virus, HIV, Parkinson’s , Alzheimer’s , dementia, anxiety, schizophrenia, psychotic, 22q11.2, substance abuse, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, hepatitis, or cirrhosis). Additional studies were identified from prior literature. Ongoing clinical trials were identified through clinical trial registries.

Study Selection: Of the 174 records retrieved, 21 were excluded, as they were not original investigations. An additional 21 records were excluded for falling outside the scope of this review. Of the 132 studies included in this review, 115 were clinical trials and 17 were preclinical studies.

Data Extraction: A wide range of studies was included in this review to capture information that would be of interest to psychiatrists in clinical practice.

Results: This review of SAMe in the treatment of major depressive disorder found promising but limited evidence of efficacy and safety to support its use as a monotherapy and as an augmentation for other antidepressants. Additionally, preliminary evidence suggests that SAMe may ameliorate symptoms in certain neurocognitive, substance use, and psychotic disorders and comorbid medical conditions.

Conclusions: S-adenosylmethionine holds promise as a treatment for multiple neuropsychiatric conditions, but the body of evidence has limitations. The encouraging findings support further study of SAMe in both psychiatric and comorbid medical illnesses.

J Clin Psychiatry 2017;78(6):e656-e667

https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.16r11113

aDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

bDepartment of Psychiatry, New York Medical College, Vahalla

cInstitute of Metabolic Disease, Baylor Research Institute, Dallas, Texas

dDepartment of Psychiatry, Michigan State University, East Lansing

eButler Hospital, Brown Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Providence, Rhode Island

fDepartment of Psychiatry, UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, California

gColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York

hDepression Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston

*Corresponding author: Anup Sharma, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 10th Floor Gates Bldg, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 ([email protected]).

Complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine includes a wide range of biological, psychological, and mind-body treatments being used to enhance standard medical practices and improve patient outcomes. Integrative psychiatry, a form of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine, “seeks to enrich mainstream mental health care with valuable treatments from global healing traditions as well as from modern laboratories in related fields.”1(p xiv),2 Complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine interventions include nutraceuticals, classified by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as “dietary supplements,” defined as products intended for ingestion that contain ingredients such as vitamins, minerals, amino acids, herbs or other botanicals and nutrient concentrates, metabolites, or constituents. Many patients with mental health disorders utilize these modalities, often without physician supervision.3,4 Understanding the growing evidence supporting the efficacy of certain complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine therapies will prepare clinicians to better advise patients when discussing integrative treatments.

S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) was discovered in 1952 by the late Italian scientist and former National Institutes of Health biochemistry director Giulio Cantoni.5,6 It is an endogenous, intracellular amino acid metabolite and enzyme cosubstrate involved in multiple crucial biochemical pathways, including biosynthesis of hormones and neurotransmitters.7-9 SAMe concentrations have been measured in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), with ranges established in normal10,11 and disease states. SAMe deficiency in CSF has been reported in patients with rare inherited defects in folate and methionine metabolism12,13 as well as in more common diseases such as depressive disorders, Alzheimer’s dementia, Parkinson’s disease, and HIV infection.14,15 Deficiencies of folate and vitamin B12, necessary cofactors in the synthesis of SAMe, may account for decreased SAMe levels, especially in patients with depression and dementia. Studies14,15 have shown that with either oral or parenteral treatment, SAMe crosses the blood-brain barrier and increases CSF levels, including those in patients with neuropsychiatric conditions. As a complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine therapy, SAMe has been utilized for treatment of psychiatric and medical conditions in Europe for over 30 years. In the United States, it became better known after 1999 as an over-the-counter dietary supplement under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act.2

This review summarizes clinical trials of SAMe for treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders and comorbid conditions encountered by psychiatrists in practice. To provide information that will assist clinicians considering treatment options in a broad range of complex clinical situations, we discuss the literature encompassing samples of patients with a wide variety of neuropsychological symptoms for whom decisions about psychiatric treatments may take into account coexisting medical conditions and medication interactions. In addition to preclinical research, we include results from controlled trials, open studies, and case reports on SAMe monotherapy and augmentation therapy. SAMe safety, contraindications, and medication interactions are addressed. This review also highlights limitations of the current literature and suggests future potential areas for research.

METHODS

A literature search conducted between July 15, 2015, and September 28, 2016, utilized electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Google Scholar by combining search terms for SAMe (s-adenosyl methionine or s-adenosyl-l-methionine) with terms for relevant disease states, including major depressive disorder, MDD, depression, perinatal depression, human immunodeficiency virus, HIV, Parkinson’s , Alzheimer’s , dementia, anxiety, schizophrenia, psychotic, 22q11.2, substance abuse, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, hepatitis, or cirrhosis. Additional studies were identified using previous literature reviews, meta-analyses, books, and book chapters (Figure 1 [PRISMA flowchart]). Ongoing clinical trials were identified through ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO (World Health Organization) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.

clinical points
  • S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) is a viable treatment in major depressive disorder, and early evidence suggests that it holds promise for a number of neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Clinical opportunities for the use of SAMe may include multiple neuropsychiatric disorders and comorbid medical conditions.
  • Additional research is needed to strengthen the body of evidence.

RESULTS

Preclinical Studies

S-adenosylmethionine is the universal methyl donor in more than 100 methyltransferase reactions that regulate essential metabolic pathways (see reviews by Cantoni6 and Bottiglieri16). Methylation involves the transfer of a methyl group (CH3) to an acceptor molecule (Figure 2), including DNA bases, proteins, phospholipids, free amino acids, and neurotransmitters. DNA methylation can turn gene transcription “on” or “off.” Similarly, methylation of proteins results in posttranslational modifications that can regulate enzyme activity. Methylation of phospholipids is necessary for cell-membrane integrity and optimal function of receptors in the lipid membrane bilayer. Aberrant methylation has been implicated as a pathogenic mechanism in central nervous system (CNS) disorders, including depression and dementia.16,18 Methyl group donation is a target mechanism to prevent disease, to delay disease progression, and to enhance therapeutic outcomes.16,19

Figure 1

Click figure to enlarge

Figure 2

Click figure to enlarge

S-adenosylmethionine has been studied in animal models of depression.20,21 In rodents, SAMe dose dependently decreases immobility time in the forced swimming test22 and increases concentrations of CNS monoamine neurotransmitters serotonin and norepinephrine.23 Animal studies show that chronic SAMe administration increases dopaminergic tone in brain regions, including rat striatum,24 and increases CNS β-adrenergic receptor density and activity.25,26 Thus, studies of central monoaminergic neurotransmitters support proposed mechanisms for SAMe antidepressant effects. SAMe may also have modulatory effects on cell-signaling pathways in the CNS. In rats, chronic treatment with SAMe resulted in a marked increase in calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) in synaptic vesicles from the hippocampus, as well as a marked increase of synapsin I in the synaptic cytosol of the hippocampus and frontal cortex.27 Typical antidepressants have been shown to activate CaMKII and synapsin I, which suggests that SAMe may share a similar modulatory action on neurotransmitter release.

A growing literature linking relative hypomethylation to disease pathophysiology in dementia includes reports of decreased SAMe concentrations in CSF in patients with Alzheimer’s disease,28 hypomethylation of proteins that regulate levels of CNS phosphorylated tau,29,30 and hypomethylation of genes that affect expression of β-amyloid protein.31 SAMe affects site-specific methylation of DNA promoter regions that regulate gene function, and carboxymethylation of proteins that can regulate β-amyloid and tau proteins, neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease.18

Clinical Trials

Depressive disorders. The antidepressant effects of SAMe were first described in 1970s.32 Early clinical studies used parenteral formulations until an oral preparation became available in the 1980s.33 More than 50 clinical trials in the United States and Europe have evaluated SAMe in the treatment of depressive disorders: 17 open-label trials with 708 patients (see Supplementary eTable 1); 19 double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials of SAMe including 878 patients (Table 1); and 21 controlled trials comparing SAMe with other antidepressants with a total of 1,591 patients (Table 2). Observations of SAMe-induced hypomania or mania in early studies45,65,69-71 limited subsequent prospective clinical trials to unipolar major depressive episodes, although formal diagnostic criteria were not consistently used in early trials.

Table 1

Click figure to enlarge

Table 2

Click figure to enlarge

SAMe compared with placebo. S-adenosylmethionine has been compared to placebo for depressive symptoms in 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (Table 1). Six of 9 controlled studies conducted between 1976 and 1988 reported that intravenous (200-400 mg/d) or intramuscular (45-200 mg/d) SAMe was more effective than placebo for depression.37,41,43,62,72 Starting in the 1990s, adequate oral doses (800-1,600 mg) of enteric-coated, stabilized SAMe could be utilized in clinical studies. Overall, 12 of the 19 randomized, placebo-controlled trials showed the antidepressant effect of SAMe to be significantly greater than placebo for depressive syndromes (P < .05, Table 1), although many of these studies used samples in which diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) were not required or MDD was not a primary diagnosis. In 1 of 2 studies that failed to find a significant difference compared to placebo, an older, less stable oral form of SAMe was used, in which the tablets were degraded due to excess exposure to air.46 In the other study,52 both SAMe and escitalopram failed to outperform placebo.

A seminal 2002 meta-analysis by Hardy et al,73 commissioned by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), including 28 of 47 RCTs on depression through the year 2000, remains the only SAMe meta-analysis published in the past 15 years. This fairly exhaustive meta-analysis excluded 2 potentially informative studies50,67 comparing SAMe against tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) due to insufficient statistical description and 1 study64 because the authors were unable to obtain the article. Regarding placebo comparisons, Cerutti et al49 was excluded because it covered postpartum depression. Fazio et al32 and Agnoli et al35 were excluded because their data were covered in other articles. Hardy and colleagues73 examined effect size and risk ratio of response in these studies. Only 3 studies were evaluable in the risk-ratio analysis, which all favored SAMe. However, the authors could not draw definitive conclusions because overall power was modest due to small sample sizes, differences between groups were nonsignificant, and studies had methodological limitations. The effect-size analysis included 11 studies. The authors found no escalating dose-response effect, perhaps due to the mixture of studies using oral versus intramuscular SAMe. Nonetheless, the authors found that SAMe monotherapy was more effective than placebo in treating depressive symptoms, with an overall effect size of −0.65 (95% CI, −1.05 to −0.25).73 This corresponds to an improvement in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) of 5-6 points. While this is often considered clinically significant in a single trial, because the studies were based on different editions of the HDRS with different numbers of items (eg, 17 vs 21), the authors considered 10 points to represent clinically significant change. Thus, although SAMe demonstrated an advantage over placebo, the clinical significance is to be considered with caution.

SAMe compared with other antidepressants. Several double-blind RCTs compared SAMe to other antidepressants: TCAs, nomifensine, minaprine, and escitalopram (Table 2). Early RCTs43,54,56,58,60 showed parenteral SAMe (150-400 mg/d) to be as effective or superior to TCAs (clomipramine, amitriptyline, imipramine), with fewer side effects. Subsequently, 2 larger studies67,68 (n = 295, n = 293) found intramuscular SAMe (400 mg/d) to be as efficacious as oral imipramine (150 mg/d) in treating MDD for 4 weeks. Additionally, 2 large studies by Di Padova and colleagues74 comparing SAMe against imipramine suggested equivalency (effect size = 0.13; 95% CI, −0.10 to 0.36), although these reports were not published in peer-reviewed journals. Four RCTs, including 1 large study (n = 281)67 and 3 smaller studies (n ≤ 30),64-66 found oral SAMe (1,600 mg/d) to be as efficacious as oral desipramine (250 mg/d) and oral imipramine (140-150 mg/d). Overall, in 18 controlled trials, SAMe was as effective as clomipramine,54-56,60,61 imipramine,43,53,62,67,68 and nomifensine.59

One recent multicenter RCT (n = 189)52 comparing SAMe, escitalopram, and placebo failed to identify significant differences among the 3 arms at 12 weeks, perhaps due to an abnormally high placebo response rate. Reanalysis of the data from subjects enrolled at 1 of 2 sites (n = 144) found that improvements in depression with SAMe were equivalent to improvements with escitalopram and significantly greater than that with placebo.75 A second reanalysis of the same trial identified an intersite difference in the proportion of women to men and analyzed the outcomes separately for men and women76 using the full sample from both sites. SAMe was found to be superior to placebo among males (n = 51) but not females (n = 62). Whether there is a significant sex-specific difference in antidepressant response requires validation by future studies.

Meta-analyses73,77 concluded that SAMe and TCAs were equally efficacious in treating depression. The Hardy et al73 meta-analysis examined studies of SAMe versus TCAs. Eleven studies included in the risk analysis for response collectively produced risk ratios of approximately 1, which supported equality between SAMe and the comparison antidepressant drugs. The corresponding effect-size analysis of 14 studies also found a nonsignificant difference between SAMe and its comparators, suggesting equivalent efficacy. However, most of these studies were limited by the lack of an inactive placebo comparator arm.

SAMe in combination with other antidepressants. A number of studies support the use of SAMe as an adjunctive treatment for MDD. An RCT78 of add-on parenteral SAMe (250 mg/d) versus placebo injections in patients receiving either clomipramine or mianserin showed improved clinical symptoms by day 10 in the group receiving parenteral SAMe compared to placebo. In an open-label trial,79 patients with MDD (n = 30) who had not fully responded to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or venlafaxine were treated with oral SAMe (800 mg/d) for 2 weeks, followed by oral SAMe (1,600 mg/d) for an additional 4 weeks. At 6 weeks, 50% of patients achieved clinical response and 43% achieved clinical remission. Reduction in depressive symptoms reached statistical significance at week 1 and remained significant through week 6 (P < .001). In another open-label study,80 MDD patients (n = 33) who failed to respond to at least 8 weeks of treatment with 2 adequate and stable doses of antidepressants were treated with a fixed dose of adjunctive SAMe (800 mg/d). At 8 weeks, clinical response was achieved in 60% of patients and remission in 36% based on HDRS. Changes from baseline were significant by week 1 and remained significant by week 8 (P < .001). In an RCT,51 outpatients with MDD (n = 73) who were nonresponders or partial responders to SSRI or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) antidepressants were randomized to receive adjunctive SAMe (up to 1,600 mg/d) or placebo for 6 weeks. Both response rates (SAMe, 36.1% vs placebo, 17.6%) and remission rates (SAMe, 25.8% vs placebo, 11.7%) were significantly higher in patients receiving SAMe (P < .05). A recent meta-analysis81 examining adjunctive nutraceuticals for depression demonstrated positive results for SAMe.

A multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled add-on study82 of 800 mg SAMe (MSI-195, a novel SAMe formulation with improved bioavailability) for patients with MDD with inadequate responses to antidepressant treatment was completed in 2015. Results are not yet published, but a press release83 from the sponsor stated that MSI-195 did not demonstrate efficacy over placebo, although post hoc analysis identified a responsive subgroup of 143 subjects (74 on MSI-195 and 69 on placebo) after patients with obesity, unstable symptom profiles, or both were excluded. In this subanalysis using last observation carried forward, the MSI-195 produced a significant reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale of −3.41 (P = .031) relative to placebo, with an effect size of 0.36.83

SAMe in depression with comorbid medical conditions. Depression and HIV. Relatively low concentrations of SAMe have been reported in the CSF from patients with depression or HIV infection.14,15 An 8-week, open-label study assessed 20 HIV seropositive individuals with MDD treated with SAMe (800-1,600 mg/d) supplemented with vitamin B12 (1,000 μg/d) and folic acid (800 μg).84 Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis demonstrated significant reduction in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) mean (SD) scores from baseline (33.5 [11.1]) to week 8 (6.6 [6.1], P < .001). Similarly, 17-item HDRS scores significantly decreased from baseline (26.5 [6.8]) to week 8 (7.7 [10.1], P < .001). Between baseline and week 1, there was evidence for a rapid therapeutic effect on BDI and HDRS (P < .01). At 8 weeks, the remission rate (17-item HDRS of ≤ 7) was 79% for ITT analysis and 93% for the 15 subjects who completed the study. Two patients reported transient nausea, and 1 reported transient diarrhea. No patients ended participation due to side effects. This encouraging result warrants further SAMe research in this population.

Depression and Parkinson’s disease. Estimated rates of depression in patients with Parkinson’s disease range from 30% to 50%.85 Significant side effects and potential interactions with selegiline, a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) used to treat Parkinson’s disease, can limit use of prescription antidepressants.86 SAMe has been proposed to protect dopaminergic neurons from levodopa (l-dopa)-induced neurotoxicity.87 In Parkinson’s disease, chronic treatment with l-dopa depletes blood levels of SAMe.88 l-Dopa is methylated to 3-O-methyldopa by catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT). Since SAMe is the methyl donor in this reaction, its levels become depleted with l-dopa treatment. Preclinical studies show that acute treatment with l-dopa markedly depletes SAMe levels in liver and brain tissue.25 In Parkinson’s disease, l-dopa treatment is associated with increased levels of total homocysteine in plasma89 and CSF90 as a by-product of increased COMT methylation of l-dopa.

In 3 small trials44,91,92 in patients with Parkinson’s disease and MDD (n = 13, n = 21, n = 32), SAMe (1,600-4,000 mg/d) significantly reduced depression scores on HDRS (P < .05). A 10 week, open-label study91 involving patients with comorbid treatment-resistant MDD and Parkinson’s disease (n = 13) showed significant improvement in HDRS depression scores following administration of SAMe monotherapy (800-3,600 mg/daily). Mean (SD) HDRS scores dropped from a baseline of 27.09 (6.04) to 9.55 (7.29) (P < .002) after 10 weeks. Of 11 completers, 10 had 50% or more improvement on the HDRS. Two patients dropped out due to increased anxiety; other side effects included nausea (n = 1) and diarrhea (n = 2). In another 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT in patients with Parkinson’s disease and depression (n = 32), both SAMe and escitalopram groups had significantly improved depression scores compared to placebo (P < .05).92 In 2 of 3 clinical trials, SAMe improved Parkinson’s disease motor symptoms.91,92 Larger controlled studies are needed to follow-up these preliminary findings in Parkinson’s disease.93

Depression and osteoarthritis or fibromyalgia. S-adenosylmethionine has been reported to exert clinically significant anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects.73,94-98 While the mechanism remains to be elucidated, SAMe does not appear to alter the eicosanoid system in the same manner as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but it may enhance proteoglycan synthesis and secretion.33,94 In several RCTs99-106 including more than 22,000 patients, SAMe was as effective as NSAIDs in relieving pain in osteoarthritis. An AHRQ meta-analysis73 of 8 studies comparing SAMe to NSAIDs found equivalent efficacy on the primary outcome measure of pain symptoms (visual analog scale [VAS], comparative effect size = 0.11; 95% CI, −0.56 to 0.35). In 3 of 4 small RCTs107-110 in patients with fibromyalgia, SAMe (200-800 mg) significantly reduced pain symptom primary outcomes including the VAS (P < .05) compared to placebo. Concurrently, SAMe improved symptoms of depression (HDRS or BDI, P < .05). These results warrant further investigation into SAMe treatment for patients with MDD and rheumatologic comorbidities.

Sexual dysfunction secondary to depression or antidepressant medication. Sexual dysfunction is commonly associated with MDD as well as with chronic use of most standard antidepressant treatment, leading to interest in agents that specifically treat or reduce the emergence of antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction.111 One single-site RCT112 (described in detail in “SAMe in combination with other antidepressants” section51) of SAMe augmentation in SSRI/SNRI nonresponders examined whether adjunctive SAMe was associated with greater improvement in sexual functioning than adjunctive placebo. Relative to those who got placebo, men treated with adjunctive SAMe demonstrated significantly lower arousal dysfunction (P = .0012) and degree of erectile dysfunction (P = .01) at study end point independent of treatment-associated change in depression severity. Whether SAMe may benefit male arousal and erectile dysfunction in MDD can be further assessed in prospective trials as well as in reanalyses of previously published studies.

Neurocognitive disorders and cognitive function. Major depressive disorder is commonly associated with cognitive impairment. Preclinical and early clinical trials17,113-115 provide some support for beneficial effects of SAMe alone or in combination with other nutraceuticals on cognitive function. A secondary analysis116 of data from an RCT on adjunctive SAMe for MDD (n = 46) demonstrated that oral SAMe (1,600 mg/d), as compared to placebo, improved 2 memory-related cognitive functions (recall, P = .04, and word-finding, P = .09) but not 5 other cognitive domains. These preliminary findings suggest that SAMe may have beneficial effects on memory-related cognition in MDD. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether this effect is independent of improvement in depressive symptoms.

Linnebank and colleagues28 found that CSF levels of SAMe in patients with Alzheimer’s disease were significantly reduced compared to controls. A 1-year, open-label study117 that treated early stage Alzheimer’s disease patients (n = 14) with a nutraceutical formulation containing SAMe (400 mg) in addition to other vitamins (folic acid, 400 μg; vitamin B12, 6 μg) and nutraceuticals (α-tocopherol, 30 IU; N-acetylcysteine, 600 mg; acetyl-L-carnitine, 500 mg) demonstrated improvement in cognitive symptoms as assessed by the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) and clock-drawing tests. Family caregivers also reported improvement in multiple domains of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. In another pilot study118 in moderate- to late-stage Alzheimer’s disease (n = 12), treatment with a similar nutraceutical formulation containing SAMe did not show statistical separation between active and placebo groups, but some suggestive signals were observed in post hoc data analyses, including greater delay in cognitive decline as measured by the DRS and clock-drawing tests among those who got active nutraceutical formulation. Recently, a larger, multisite, phase 2 RCT119 was conducted in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (n = 106) randomized to receive either a nutraceutical formulation containing SAMe (400 mg) or placebo for 3 to 6 months. Relative to the placebo group, within 3 months, the nutraceutical-formulation cohort demonstrated improved cognitive performance on the CLOX 1 (P = .0083; 95% CI, 0.4481 to 2.9343) and the age- and education-adjusted DRS (P = .0266; 95% CI, 0.1722 to 2.7171). Notably, in the nutraceutical formulation group, there was significant improvement in the DRS memory domain scores from baseline to 3-month end point (P < .0001; 95% CI, 1.2348 to 3.2283). Across all studies evaluating the cognitive effects of nutraceutical formulation containing SAMe, the treatment was well tolerated. Interpretation of the results of these trials with regard to effect of SAMe is limited because SAMe was 1 of multiple ingredients in the nutraceutical formulation. Future studies in Alzheimer’s disease may include clinical trial designs that isolate the contribution of SAMe to cognitive improvement.

Psychotic disorders. Aggression in schizophrenia has been linked to a genetic variant of the COMT gene associated with low activity of an enzyme critical for neurotransmission.120 As SAMe increases COMT enzymatic activity,121 researchers investigated its utility in managing aggression in a subset of patients with schizophrenia. In 1 RCT,122 18 patients with chronic schizophrenia and the low-activity COMT polymorphism (codon 158 polymorphism) were randomly assigned to either SAMe (800 mg/d) or placebo for 8 weeks. There was a significant decrease in the primary outcome measure of aggression (Overt Aggression Scale) from baseline to 8-week end point in only the SAMe group (P = .016), resulting in a significant group-by-time interaction (P = .032). While there were no significant group differences in side effects, the study was terminated because of worsening irritability in 2 subjects who received SAMe.

The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is a genetic disorder associated with high rates of psychiatric comorbidity including psychosis, depression, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.123 Individuals with this syndrome are missing 1 copy of the COMT gene. The ability of SAMe to increase COMT enzymatic activity has been proposed as a potential therapeutic mechanism for alleviating psychiatric symptoms in this patient population. A 12-week randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-control study124 assessed feasibility and safety of SAMe (1,600 mg/d) in 12 patients with 22q11.2DS. No significant group differences were found for the randomized population in the primary outcome measure (Clinical Global Impressions Scale).125 The subset with 22q11.2DS and comorbid depression (n = 5) who received oral SAMe demonstrated numerically greater improvement in Children’s Depression Rating Scale-Revised scores compared to those who received placebo. Future studies may include larger samples of subjects with greater symptom severity.

Liver disease associated with substance use disorders, infections, and cholestasis. S-adenosylmethionine may have a role in treating depression in patients who develop hepatitis or cirrhosis due to comorbid alcohol dependence126 or intravenous drug use,127 as it does not exacerbate hepatic dysfunction. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that SAMe can improve liver function (eg, decreased transaminase levels) or liver disease outcomes in hepatitis, alcoholic and viral liver cirrhosis, and cholestasis.73,128-133 In the largest study in this group, Mato and colleagues131 conducted an RCT with 123 patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis. The primary outcome, measured as the overall all-cause mortality or liver transplantation at 2-year study end point, was 30% in the placebo group and 16% in the SAMe group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = .077). As part of the post hoc analysis, when patients in child C class (least favorable prognostic group) were excluded (n = 8), overall mortality or liver transplantation was significantly greater in the placebo group compared to the SAMe group (29% vs 12%, P = .025).

Use in Pregnancy, Risks, and Medication Interactions

The need for safer treatments for depression in women during pregnancy and postpartum is urgent, particularly in light of evidence that untreated maternal MDD may adversely affect fetal and neonatal development. The use of certain prescription antidepressants has been associated with increased risk of birth defects.134 SAMe has been evaluated in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in conjunction with the bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid,135,136 which is a natural bile acid commonly used to reverse impaired bile formation.137 A systematic review and meta-analysis138 of 10 RCTs (n = 727 pregnant women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy) found that a combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and SAMe significantly (P < .05) reduced rates of cesarian sections, preterm birth, and fetal asphyxia. The mean endogenous CSF concentration of SAMe in healthy infants and youth may be greater than that in adults, although rigorous studies of age-related changes in levels of SAMe are needed.139 Trials of SAMe during pregnancy and breast-feeding with long-term monitoring of child development would be worthwhile.

The most common side effect of SAMe is nausea, and diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, or vomiting occurs less frequently. Occasionally, agitation, anxiety, or insomnia can occur in patients sensitive to activating effects of SAMe. As with other antidepressants, SAMe can trigger hypomanic or manic symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder. Overall, SAMe has a favorable side-effect profile in that it does not cause sexual dysfunction or weight gain. Another advantage is that SAMe does not cause cognitive or memory dysfunction, which is particularly important to patients with dementia, age-related cognitive or memory decline, and traumatic brain injury. SAMe is well tolerated in geriatric patients as indicated in open trials showing improved recall and word-finding scores.115

S-adenosylmethionine has few known adverse interactions with other drugs. One case of serotonin syndrome in a 71-year-old woman treated with escalating doses of clomipramine while taking SAMe was reported.140 Her symptoms developed 48-72 hours after the dose of clomipramine was increased 3-fold (25 mg/d to 75 mg/d), while the dose of SAMe was kept constant. It is likely that her symptoms developed from the rapid dose escalation of clomipramine. No other cases of serotonin syndrome attributable to SAMe have been reported, including in trials where SAMe was used to augment SSRIs and TCAs. Furthermore, in an open trial that included 60 depressed patients taking MAOIs, augmentation with SAMe was beneficial and caused no adverse effects.141 In patients with medication-induced elevated liver function tests, SAMe reduced or normalized liver functions.141 The theoretical possibility that SAMe could induce hyperhomocysteinemia has never been substantiated nor has any confirmed case been reported. A small study of adults given a high dose of oral SAMe (1,600 mg for 5 days) showed no change in serum homocysteine levels.142

DISCUSSION

This review of the role of SAMe in the treatment of MDD found encouraging evidence of its efficacy and safety as a monotherapy and as an augmentation for other antidepressants. Since the FDA AHRQ review,73 additional studies have generally supported SAMe as efficacious for treatment of MDD and comparable to several prescription antidepressants, although comparisons against newer-generation antidepressants are needed. In addition to depression, this review found supportive early evidence for SAMe in certain neurocognitive, substance abuse, and psychotic disorders. Studies of SAMe in primary anxiety disorders were not identified. Additional clinical studies are needed to further delineate the role of SAMe in neuropsychiatric conditions.

Clinical reviews often exclude studies in patients with comorbid medical illnesses or concurrent prescription medications. Consequently, because of these exclusions, clinical opportunities for using SAMe are often overlooked. Depressed patients present with a broad array of comorbid conditions, concurrent medications, and medication-related side effects. SAMe may ameliorate symptoms associated with medical conditions such as hepatic disease, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and cognitive and memory decline. As is the case with many over-the-counter natural products, the evidence so far suggests that, compared to prescription medications, SAMe may cause fewer and less severe side effects and considerably fewer drug interactions. Moreover, SAMe may prevent or reverse side effects caused by other medications, such as liver or sexual dysfunction. Knowing that evidence generally supports the safety and efficacy of SAMe in both psychiatric and medical illnesses could impact clinical decision making.

Certain limitations in our review should be noted. First, the methodology of studies cited in this review varies due to the inclusion of diverse neuropsychiatric conditions, smaller studies, open trials, and larger RCTs. This heterogeneity limits interpretation on the clinical significance of SAMe in neuropsychiatric disorders. Second, the relatively modest body of research during the past 15 years precluded our undertaking a new meta-analysis. The consensus of this work group was that the relatively limited new material would not significantly change the overall conclusions of the Hardy et al meta-analysis,73 which, while generally positive, were cautious and acknowledged the limitations of the body of work, such as small sample sizes, different doses and delivery systems, and concerns about publication biases.

Careful consideration over whether to pursue treatment with SAMe as opposed to a registered antidepressant is required on the part of the clinician and the patient. Clinicians who recommend SAMe need to inform their patients that this compound has not been tested as rigorously as its FDA-approved counterparts, and as such, its relative efficacy cannot be guaranteed. However, the risks of SAMe compare quite favorably with prescription antidepressants, particularly in that it does not cause sexual dysfunction or weight gain (2 of the most common causes for antidepressant discontinuation), and it is less likely to be life threatening in patients who are at risk for overdosing during suicide attempts. No cases of death by SAMe overdose have been reported. In a mouse study, lethal oral dose of SAMe was equivalent to over 400,000 mg in a 70-kg man (National Library of Medicine, 1999 RTECS [Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances], Bethesda, Maryland, record nos. 7176, 7177[ https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/rtecs/RTECSaccess.html]). Although the cost of SAMe is not covered by insurance companies, compared with the high copayments on many prescriptions, it may be a reasonable expense.2 Patients should be discouraged from self-medicating their depression and should be encouraged to seek professional evaluation before starting any treatment.

CONCLUSION

This review provides a broad perspective on the role of SAMe in the treatment of depression, neuropsychiatric disorders, and comorbid medical conditions. Notably, encouraging evidence is found for the safety and efficacy of SAMe as a monotherapy and as an adjunctive agent for MDD, although with several caveats in view of the heterogeneity of the studies and methodological concerns as discussed. Preliminary evidence suggests SAMe may hold promise in a number of neuropsychiatric conditions and comorbid medical illnesses. Exploration of the full range of potential benefits of SAMe through controlled clinical studies is much needed and is advised.

Submitted: July 28, 2016; accepted October 12, 2016.

Potential conflicts of interest: Dr Sharma is member of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) Council on Research and Quality. Dr Gerbarg receives royalties from 2 books that include information about S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe), and serves as a consultant for National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) (award #8T007483: The Treatment of Depression With Yoga and Walking). Dr Bottiglieri reports having been the chairman of the advisory board for Methylation Sciences; holds stock options in Methylation Sciences; is scientific advisor to Gnosis S.p.A., Nestle Health Sciences, and Pamlab; and has received research funding from Nestle Health Sciences, Pamlab, distributor of B vitamins as a medical food. Dr Carpenter has received consulting income from Magstim; has received research support from the National Institutes of Health and through clinical trial contracts between Butler Hospital and Neuronetics, NeoSync, and Cervel; and is member of the APA Council on Research and Quality. Dr Lavretsky has received grant support from the National Institute of Mental Health, NCCIH, Forest Research Institute, and Alzheimer’s Research and Prevention Foundation. Dr Brown has served as a consultant to Humanetics; holds a patent on the use of 7-keto DHEA for posttraumatic stress disorder; receives royalties from 2 books that include information about SAMe; and receives honoraria for lectures on complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine that may include information on SAMe. Dr Mischoulon has received research support from the FisherWallace, Nordic Naturals, Methylation Sciences, and PharmoRx; has received honoraria from Massachusetts General Hospital Psychiatry Academy; and has received royalties from Lippincott Williams & Wilkins for the published book Natural Medications for Psychiatric Disorders: Considering the Alternatives. Drs Massoumi and Muskin report no competing interests.

Funding/support: None.

Acknowledgments: The authors appreciate the helpful review and input from American Psychiatric Association Council on Research.

Supplementary material: See accompanying pages.

REFERENCES

1. Muskin PR, Gerbarg PL, Brown RP. Along roads less traveled: complementary, alternative, and integrative treatments. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2013;36(1):xiii-xv. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.psc.2013.01.009

2. Brown RP, Gerbarg PL, Muskin PR. How to Use Herbs, Nutrients & Yoga in Mental Health Care. New York, NY: W. W. Norton; 2009.

3. Kessler RC, Soukup J, Davis RB, et al. The use of complementary and alternative therapies to treat anxiety and depression in the United States. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158(2):289-294. PubMed doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.2.289

4. Elkins G, Rajab MH, Marcus J. Complementary and alternative medicine use by psychiatric inpatients. Psychol Rep. 2005;96(1):163-166. PubMed doi:10.2466/pr0.96.1.163-166

5. Cantoni GL. The nature of the active methyl donor formed enzymatically from l-methionine and adenosinetriphosphate1, 2. J Am Chem Soc. 1952;74:2942-2943. doi:10.1021/ja01131a519

6. Cantoni GL. The role of S-adenosylhomocysteine in the biological utilization of S-adenosylmethionine. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1985;198:47-65. PubMed

7. Curcio M, Catto E, Stramentinoli G, et al. Effect of S-adenosyl-L-methionine on serotonin metabolism in rat brain. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol. 1978;2(1):65-71. PubMed doi:10.1016/0364-7722(78)90023-1

8. Bottiglieri T, Laundy M, Martin R, et al. S-adenosylmethionine influences monoamine metabolism. Lancet. 1984;2(8396):224. PubMed doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(84)90507-5

9. Otero-Losada ME, Rubio MC. Acute changes in 5-HT metabolism after S-adenosyl-L-methionine administration. Gen Pharmacol. 1989;20(4):403-406. PubMed doi:10.1016/0306-3623(89)90186-9

10. Strauss KA, Ferreira C, Bottiglieri T, et al. Liver transplantation for treatment of severe S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase deficiency. Mol Genet Metab. 2015;116(1-2):44-52. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2015.06.005

11. Bottiglieri T, Laundy M, Crellin R, et al. Homocysteine, folate, methylation, and monoamine metabolism in depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;69(2):228-232. PubMed doi:10.1136/jnnp.69.2.228

12. Surtees R, Leonard J, Austin S. Association of demyelination with deficiency of cerebrospinal-fluid S-adenosylmethionine in inborn errors of methyl-transfer pathway. Lancet. 1991;338(8782-8783):1550-1554. PubMed doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)92373-A

13. Hyland K, Smith I, Bottiglieri T, et al. Demyelination and decreased S-adenosylmethionine in 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase deficiency. Neurology. 1988;38(3):459-462. PubMed doi:10.1212/WNL.38.3.459

14. Bottiglieri T, Godfrey P, Flynn T, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid S-adenosylmethionine in depression and dementia: effects of treatment with parenteral and oral S-adenosylmethionine. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990;53(12):1096-1098. PubMed doi:10.1136/jnnp.53.12.1096

15. Castagna A, Le Grazie C, Accordini A, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) and glutathione concentrations in HIV infection: effect of parenteral treatment with SAMe. Neurology. 1995;45(9):1678-1683. PubMed doi:10.1212/WNL.45.9.1678

16. Bottiglieri T. S-Adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe): from the bench to the bedside—molecular basis of a pleiotrophic molecule. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(5):1151S-1157S. PubMed

17. Bottiglieri T. Folate, vitamin B12, and s-adenosylmethionine. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2013;36(1):1-13. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.psc.2012.12.001

18. Scarpa S, Cavallaro RA, D’ Anselmi F, et al. Gene silencing through methylation: an epigenetic intervention on Alzheimer disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2006;9(4):407-414. PubMed

19. Mischoulon D, Fava M. Role of S-adenosyl-L-methionine in the treatment of depression: a review of the evidence. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(5):1158S-1161S. PubMed

20. Benelli A, Filaferro M, Bertolini A, et al. Influence of S-adenosyl-L-methionine on chronic mild stress-induced anhedonia in castrated rats. Br J Pharmacol. 1999;127(3):645-654. PubMed doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0702589

21. Genedani S, Saltini S, Benelli A, et al. Influence of SAMe on the modifications of brain polyamine levels in an animal model of depression. Neuroreport. 2001;12(18):3939-3942. PubMed doi:10.1097/00001756-200112210-00017

22. Czyrak A, Rogóz Z, Skuza G, et al. Antidepressant activity of S-adenosyl-L-methionine in mice and rats. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 1992;3(1):1-17. PubMed doi:10.1515/JBCPP.1992.3.1.1

23. Losada ME, Rubio MC. Acute effects of S-adenosyl-L-methionine on catecholaminergic central function. Eur J Pharmacol. 1989;163(2-3):353-356. PubMed doi:10.1016/0014-2999(89)90205-7

24. Bottiglieri T, Hyland K. Effect of S-adenosylmethionine on dopamine metabolism in the rat striatum: an in-vivo microdialysis study. Soc Neurosci Abstracts. 1996;2:834.

25. Cohen BM, Stramentinoli G, Sosa AL, et al. Effects of the novel antidepressant S-adenosyl-methionine on alpha 1- and beta-adrenoceptors in rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol. 1989;170(3):201-207. PubMed doi:10.1016/0014-2999(89)90540-2

26. Cimino M, Vantini G, Algeri S, et al. Age-related modification of dopaminergic and beta-Adrenergic receptor system: restoration to normal activity by modifying membrane fluidity with S-adenosylmethionine. Life Sci. 1984;34(21):2029-2039. PubMed doi:10.1016/0024-3205(84)90367-9

27. Consogno E, Tiraboschi E, Iuliano E, et al. Long-term treatment with S-adenosylmethionine induces changes in presynaptic CaM kinase II and synapsin I. Biol Psychiatry. 2001;50(5):337-344. PubMed doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01176-3

28. Linnebank M, Popp J, Smulders Y, et al. S-adenosylmethionine is decreased in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurodegener Dis. 2010;7(6):373-378. PubMed doi:10.1159/000309657

29. Sontag JM, Nunbhakdi-Craig V, Montgomery L, et al. Folate deficiency induces in vitro and mouse brain region-specific downregulation of leucine carboxyl methyltransferase-1 and protein phosphatase 2A B(alpha) subunit expression that correlate with enhanced tau phosphorylation. J Neurosci. 2008;28(45):11477-11487. PubMed doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2816-08.2008

30. Bottiglieri T, Arning E, Wasek B, et al. Acute administration of L-DOPA induces changes in methylation metabolites, reduced protein phosphatase 2A methylation, and hyperphosphorylation of Tau protein in mouse brain. J Neurosci. 2012;32(27):9173-9181. PubMed doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0125-12.2012

31. Fuso A, Nicolia V, Ricceri L, et al. S-adenosylmethionine reduces the progress of the Alzheimer-like features induced by B-vitamin deficiency in mice. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(7):1482.e1-1482.e16. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.12.013

32. Fazio C, Andreoli V, Agnoli A, et al. Therapy of schizophrenia and depressive disorders with S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine. IRCS. 1974;2:1015.

33. Stramentinoli G. Pharmacologic aspects of S-adenosylmethionine: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Am J Med. 1987;83(5A):35-42. PubMed doi:10.1016/0002-9343(87)90849-7

34. Fazio C, Andreoli V, Agnoli A, et al. Therapeutic effects and mechanism of action of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) in depressive syndromes [in Italian]. Minerva Med. 1973;64(29):1515-1529. PubMed

35. Agnoli A, Andreoli V, Casacchia M, et al. Effect of s-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAMe) upon depressive symptoms. J Psychiatr Res. 1976;13(1):43-54. PubMed doi:10.1016/0022-3956(76)90008-X

36. Barberi A, Puscateri C. Sugli effetti clinici dell s-adenosil-I-metionina (SAMe) nelle sindromi depressive. Minerva Psichiatr. 1978;19:235-243.

37. Muscettola G, Galzenati M, Balbi A. SAMe versus placebo: a double blind comparison in major depressive disorders. Adv Biochem Psychopharmacol. 1982;32:151-156. PubMed

38. Caruso I, Fumagalli M, Boccassini L, et al. Antidepressant activity of S-adenosylmethionine. Lancet. 1984;1(8382):904. PubMed doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(84)91360-6

39. Carney MW, Edeh J, Bottiglieri T, et al. Affective illness and S-adenosyl methionine: a preliminary report. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1986;9(4):379-385. PubMed doi:10.1097/00002826-198608000-00005

40. Caruso I, Fumagali M, Boccazzini L, et al. Treatment of depression in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a comparison of S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) and placebo in a double-blind study. Clin Trials. 1987;24:305310.

41. De Leo D. S-adenosylmethionine as an antidepressant. Current Therapeutic Research. 1987;41:865-870.

42. Thomas CS, Bottiglieri T, Edeh J, et al. The influence of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) on prolactin in depressed patients. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1987;2(2):97-102. PubMed doi:10.1097/00004850-198704000-00001

43. Janicak PG, Lipinski J, Davis JM, et al. S-adenosylmethionine in depression. A literature review and preliminary report. Ala J Med Sci. 1988;25(3):306-313. PubMed

44. Carrieri PB, Indaco A, Gentile S, et al. S-adenosylmethionine treatment of depression in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind, crossover study versus placebo. Current Therapeutic Research. 1990;48(1):154-160.

45. Kagan BL, Sultzer DL, Rosenlicht N, et al. Oral S-adenosylmethionine in depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 1990;147(5):591-595. PubMed doi:10.1176/ajp.147.5.591

46. Fava M, Rosenbaum JF, Birnbaum R, et al. The thyrotropin response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone as a predictor of response to treatment in depressed outpatients. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1992;86(1):42-45. PubMed doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1992.tb03223.x

47. Ancarani E, Biondi B, Bolletta A. Major depression complicating hemodialysis in patients with chronic renal failure: a multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial of S-adenosyl-L-methionine versus placebo. Current Therapeutic Research. 1993;54:680-686. doi:10.1016/S0011-393X(05)80698-8

48. Salmaggi P, Bressa GM, Nicchia G, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of S-adenosyl-L-methionine in depressed postmenopausal women. Psychother Psychosom. 1993;59(1):34-40. PubMed doi:10.1159/000288642

49. Cerutti R, Sichel MP, Perin M, et al. Psychological distress during puerperium: a novel therapeutic approach using s-adenosylmethionine. Current Therapeutic Research. 1993;53:707-716. doi:10.1016/S0011-393X(05)80742-8

50. Delle Chiaie R, Boissard G. Paper presented at the World Biological Psychiatry Congress [abstract 90-56]. Biol Psychiatry. 1997;42:245.

51. Papakostas GI, Mischoulon D, Shyu I, et al. S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitors for antidepressant nonresponders with major depressive disorder: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(8):942-948. PubMed doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09081198

52. Mischoulon D, Price LH, Carpenter LL, et al. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) versus escitalopram in major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75(4):370-376. PubMed doi:10.4088/JCP.13m08591

53. Mantero M, Pastorino P, Carolei A, et al. Controlled double-blind study (SAMe-imipramine) in depressive syndromes [in Italian]. Minerva Med. 1975;66(78):4098-4101. PubMed

54. Miccoli L, Porro V, Bertolino A. Comparison between the antidepressant activity and of S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) and that of some tricyclic drugs. Acta Neurol (Napoli). 1978;33(3):243-255. PubMed

55. Del Vecchio M, Iorio G, Cocorullo M, et al. Has SAMe (Ado-Met) an antidepressant effect: a preliminary trial versus chlorimipramine. Riv Sper Fren. 1978;102:344-358.

56. Scarzella R, Appiotti A. Confronto clinico in doppio cieco della same versus clorimipramina nelle sindromi depressive. Riv Sper Fren. 1978;102:359-365.

57. Calandra C, Roxas M, Rapisarda V. Antidepressant action of SAM in comparison to chlorimipramine. Hypotheses to interpret the mechanism of action [in Italian]. Minerva Psichiatr. 1979;20(2):147-152. PubMed

58. Monaco P, Quattrocchi F. Study of the antidepressive effects of a biological transmethylating agent (S-adenosyl-methione or SAM) [in Italian]. Riv Neurol. 1979;49(6):417-439. PubMed

59. Scaggion G, Baldan L, Domanin S, et al. Antidepressive action of S-adenosylmethionine compared to nomifensine maleate [in Italian]. Minerva Psichiatr. 1982;23(2):93-97. PubMed

60. Küfferle B, Grünberger J. Early clinical double-blind study with S-adenosyl-L-methionine: a new potential antidepressant. Adv Biochem Psychopharmacol. 1982;32:175-180. PubMed

61. Ubago JG, Gonzales Infante JM, Blanco Picabea A. Valoracion clinicade la accion antidepresiva de la sulfoadenosil-L-mentionina comparada con la de la clorimiprimina. Actas Luso Esp Neurol Psiquiatr. 1984;2:73-80.

62. Bell KM, Plon L, Bunney WE Jr, et al. S-adenosylmethionine treatment of depression: a controlled clinical trial. Am J Psychiatry. 1988;145(9):1110-1114. PubMed doi:10.1176/ajp.145.9.1110

63. Cerutti PG, Savoini G, D’ Avola G, et al. S-adenosil-metbionina. Valuazione dell’ efficacia della s-adenosil-metionina nel trattamento delle sindromi depressive: studio clinico controllato versus minaprina. Basi Razionali Ter. 1989;19:591-595.

64. Bell MB, Carreon D, Pion L, et al. Oral s-adenosylmethionine in the treatment of depression: a double-blind comparison with desipramine. Study Report. BioResearch file, 1990:53-54.

65. De Vanna M, Rigamonti R. Oral S-adenosyl-L-methionine in depression. Current Therapeutic Research. 1992;52:478-485. doi:10.1016/S0011-393X(05)80424-2

66. Bell KM, Potkin SG, Carreon D, et al. S-adenosylmethionine blood levels in major depression: changes with drug treatment. Acta Neurol Scand suppl. 1994;154:15-18. PubMed doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1994.tb05404.x

67. Delle Chiaie R, Pancheri P, Scapicchio P. Efficacy and tolerability of oral and intramuscular S-adenosyl-L-methionine 1,4-butanedisulfonate (SAMe) in the treatment of major depression: comparison with imipramine in 2 multicenter studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(5):1172S-1176S. PubMed

68. Pancheri P, Scapicchio P, Chiaie RD. A double-blind, randomized parallel-group, efficacy and safety study of intramuscular S-adenosyl-L-methionine 1,4-butanedisulphonate (SAMe) versus imipramine in patients with major depressive disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2002;5(4):287-294. PubMed doi:10.1017/S1461145702003085

69. Carney MWP, Martin R, Bottiglieri T, et al. Switch mechanism in affective illness and S-adenosylmethionine. Lancet. 1983;1(8328):820-821. PubMed doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(83)91876-7

70. Lipinski JF, Cohen BM, Frankenburg F, et al. Open trial of S-adenosylmethionine for treatment of depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1984;141(3):448-450. PubMed doi:10.1176/ajp.141.3.448

71. Carney MWP, Chary TK, Bottiglieri T, et al. Switch mechanism in affective illness and oral S-adenosylmethionine (SAM). Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150:724-725. PubMed doi:10.1192/bjp.150.5.724

72. Andreoli V, Campedelli A, Maffei F. La s-adenosil-l-metionina (same) in geropsichiatria: Uno studio clinico controllato “in aperto” nelle sindromi depressive. Minerva Psichiatr. 1978;25:172-180.

73. Hardy ML, Coulter ID, Favreau JT, Morton SC, Venuturupalli SR, Chiapelli F, et al. S-adenosyl-L-methionine for Treatment of Depression, Osteoarthritis, and Liver Disease: Summary. Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 64. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2003.

74. Di Padova C, Giudici A, Boissard G. Ademetionine and depression. Presented at: V Workshop on Methionine Metabolism: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications; February 20-24, 2000; Granada, Spain.

75. Sarris J, Papakostas GI, Vitolo O, et al. S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) versus escitalopram and placebo in major depression RCT: efficacy and effects of histamine and carnitine as moderators of response. J Affect Disord. 2014;164:76-81. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.041

76. Sarris J, Price LH, Carpenter LL, et al. Is S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) for depression only effective in males? a re-analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2015;48(4-5):141-144. PubMed

77. Bressa GM. S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAMe) as antidepressant: meta-analysis of clinical studies. Acta Neurol Scand suppl. 1994;154:7-14. PubMed doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1994.tb05403.x

78. Alvarez E, Udina C, Guillamat R. Shortening of latency period in depressed patients treated with SAMe and other antidepressant drugs. Cell Biol Rev S. 1987;1:103-110.

79. Alpert JE, Papakostas G, Mischoulon D, et al. S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) as an adjunct for resistant major depressive disorder: an open trial following partial or nonresponse to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or venlafaxine. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004;24(6):661-664. PubMed doi:10.1097/01.jcp.0000145339.45794.cd

80. De Berardis D, Marini S, Serroni N, et al. S-Adenosyl-L-methionine augmentation in patients with stage II treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: an open label, fixed dose, single-blind study. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:204649. PubMed doi:10.1155/2013/204649

81. Sarris J, Murphy J, Mischoulon D, et al. Adjunctive nutraceuticals for depression: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173(6):575-587. PubMed doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15091228

82. Add-On Study of MSI-195 (S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine, SAMe) for Patients With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). ClinicalTrials.gov website. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01912196. Updated July 26, 2013. Accessed October 12, 2015.

83. Press Release. MSI Methylation Sciences Inc. (MSI) Announces Results From the Horizon Phase 2 Trial for its Novel Treatment, MSI-195, for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). MSI Methylation Sciences Inc website. http://methylationsciences.com/index.php/media/. Accessed Feb 23, 2016.

84. Shippy RA, Mendez D, Jones K, et al. S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e) for the treatment of depression in people living with HIV/AIDS. BMC Psychiatry. 2004;4:38. PubMed doi:10.1186/1471-244X-4-38

85. Reijnders JS, Ehrt U, Weber WE, et al. A systematic review of prevalence studies of depression in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2008;23(2):183-189, quiz 313. PubMed doi:10.1002/mds.21803

86. Slaughter JR, Slaughter KA, Nichols D, et al. Prevalence, clinical manifestations, etiology, and treatment of depression in Parkinson’s disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;13(2):187-196. PubMed doi:10.1176/jnp.13.2.187

87. Werner P, Di Rocco A, Prikhojan A, et al. COMT-dependent protection of dopaminergic neurons by methionine, dimethionine and S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) against L-dopa toxicity in vitro. Brain Res. 2001;893(1-2):278-281. PubMed doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(00)03298-4

88. Cheng H, Gomes-Trolin C, Aquilonius S-M, et al. Levels of L-methionine S-adenosyltransferase activity in erythrocytes and concentrations of S-adenosylmethionine and S-adenosylhomocysteine in whole blood of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol. 1997;145(2 pt 1):580-585. PubMed doi:10.1006/exnr.1997.6466

89. Belcastro V, Pierguidi L, Castrioto A, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia recurrence in levodopa-treated Parkinson’s disease patients. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(5):661-665. PubMed doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02894.x

90. Isobe C, Abe T, Terayama Y. L-Dopa therapy increases homocysteine concentration in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17(6):717-721. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2009.09.034

91. Di Rocco A, Rogers JD, Brown R, et al. S-Adenosyl-Methionine improves depression in patients with Parkinson’s disease in an open-label clinical trial. Mov Disord. 2000;15(6):1225-1229. PubMed doi:10.1002/1531-8257(200011)15:6<1225::AID-MDS1025>3.0.CO;2-A

92. Varanese S, Hirsh S, Howard J, et al. Safety and preliminary efficacy evaluation of SAM-e and escitalopram in the treatment of depression associated with PD. Presented at: 7th International Congress on Mental Dysfunction & Other Non-Motor Features in Parkinson’s Disease; December 9-12, 2010; Barcelona, Spain.

93. Varanese S, Birnbaum Z, Rossi R, et al. Treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsons Dis. 2011;2010:480260. PubMed

94. di Padova C. S-adenosylmethionine in the treatment of osteoarthritis: review of the clinical studies. Am J Med. 1987;83(5A):60-65. PubMed doi:10.1016/0002-9343(87)90853-9

95. Zhang M, Borovikova LV, Wang H, et al. Spermine inhibition of monocyte activation and inflammation. Mol Med. 1999;5(9):595-605. PubMed

96. Di Benedetto P, Iona LG, Zidarich V. Clinical evaluation of s-adenosyl-l-methionine versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in primary fibromyalgia. Current Therapeutic Research. 1993;53:222-229. doi:10.1016/S0011-393X(05)80250-4

97. Ianniello A, Ostuni PA, Sfriso P, et al. S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine in sjögren’s syndrome and fibromyalgia. Current Therapeutic Research. 1994;55:699-706. doi:10.1016/S0011-393X(05)80805-7

98. Grassetto M, Varotto A. Primary fibromyalgia is responsive to s-adenosyl-l-methionine. Current Therapeutic Research. 1994;55:797-806. doi:10.1016/S0011-393X(05)80773-8

99. Berger R, Nowak H. A new medical approach to the treatment of osteoarthritis: report of an open phase IV study with ademetionine (Gumbaral). Am J Med. 1987;83(5A):84-88. PubMed doi:10.1016/0002-9343(87)90858-8

100. Schumacher HR Jr. Osteoarthritis: the clinical picture, pathogenesis, and management with studies on a new therapeutic agent, S-adenosylmethionine. Am J Med. 1987;83(5A):1-4. PubMed doi:10.1016/0002-9343(87)90843-6

101. Bradley JD, Flusser D, Katz BP, et al. A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial of intravenous loading with S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) followed by oral SAM therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 1994;21(5):905-911. PubMed

102. Vetter G. Double-blind comparative clinical trial with S-adenosylmethionine and indomethacin in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Am J Med. 1987;83(5A):78-80. PubMed doi:10.1016/0002-9343(87)90856-4

103. Caruso I, Pietrogrande V. Italian double-blind multicenter study comparing S-adenosylmethionine, naproxen, and placebo in the treatment of degenerative joint disease. Am J Med. 1987;83(5A):66-71. PubMed doi:10.1016/0002-9343(87)90854-0

104. Maccagno A, Di Giorgio EE, Caston OL, et al. Double-blind controlled clinical trial of oral S-adenosylmethionine versus piroxicam in knee osteoarthritis. Am J Med. 1987;83(5A):72-77. PubMed doi:10.1016/0002-9343(87)90855-2

105. Glorioso S, Todesco S, Mazzi A, et al. Double-blind multicentre study of the activity of S-adenosylmethionine in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1985;5(1):39-49. PubMed

106. Müller-Fassbender H. Double-blind clinical trial of S-adenosylmethionine versus ibuprofen in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Am J Med. 1987;83(5A):81-83. PubMed doi:10.1016/0002-9343(87)90857-6

107. Tavoni A, Vitali C, Bombardieri S, et al. Evaluation of S-adenosylmethionine in primary fibromyalgia: a double-blind crossover study. Am J Med. 1987;83(5A):107-110. PubMed doi:10.1016/0002-9343(87)90862-X

108. Tavoni A, Jeracitano G, Cirigliano G. Evaluation of S-adenosylmethionine in secondary fibromyalgia: a double-blind study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1998;16(1):106-107. PubMed

109. Jacobsen S, Danneskiold-Sams׸e B, Andersen RB. Oral S-adenosylmethionine in primary fibromyalgia: double-blind clinical evaluation. Scand J Rheumatol. 1991;20(4):294-302. PubMed doi:10.3109/03009749109096803

110. Volkmann H, N׸rregaard J, Jacobsen S, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study of intravenous S-adenosyl-L-methionine in patients with fibromyalgia. Scand J Rheumatol. 1997;26(3):206-211. PubMed doi:10.3109/03009749709065682

111. Taylor MJ, Rudkin L, Bullemor-Day P, et al. Strategies for managing sexual dysfunction induced by antidepressant medication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5(5):CD003382. PubMed

112. Dording CM, Mischoulon D, Shyu I, et al. SAMe and sexual functioning. Eur Psychiatry. 2012;27(6):451-454. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.01.003

113. Chan A, Shea TB. Effects of dietary supplementation with N-acetyl cysteine, acetyl-L-carnitine and S-adenosyl methionine on cognitive performance and aggression in normal mice and mice expressing human ApoE4. Neuromolecular Med. 2007;9(3):264-269. PubMed doi:10.1007/s12017-007-8005-y

114. Shea TB, Chan A. S-adenosyl methionine: a natural therapeutic agent effective against multiple hallmarks and risk factors associated with Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2008;13(1):67-70. PubMed

115. Fontanari D, Di Palma C, Giorgetti G, Violante F, Voltolina M. Effects of S-adenosyl-L-methionine on cognitive and vigilance functions in the elderly. Current Therapeutic Research. 1994;55:682-689. doi:10.1016/S0011-393X(05)80803-3

116. Levkovitz Y, Alpert JE, Brintz CE, et al. Effects of S-adenosylmethionine augmentation of serotonin-reuptake inhibitor antidepressants on cognitive symptoms of major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2012;136(3):1174-1178. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.04.059

117. Chan A, Paskavitz J, Remington R, et al. Efficacy of a vitamin/nutriceutical formulation for early-stage Alzheimer’s disease: a 1-year, open-label pilot study with an 16-month caregiver extension. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2008;23(6):571-585. PubMed doi:10.1177/1533317508325093

118. Remington R, Chan A, Paskavitz J, et al. Efficacy of a vitamin/nutriceutical formulation for moderate-stage to later-stage Alzheimer’s disease: a placebo-controlled pilot study. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2009;24(1):27-33. PubMed doi:10.1177/1533317508325094

119. Remington R, Bechtel C, Larsen D, et al. A phase II randomized clinical trial of a nutritional formulation for cognition and mood in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;45(2):395-405. PubMed

120. Soyka M. Neurobiology of aggression and violence in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2011;37(5):913-920. PubMed doi:10.1093/schbul/sbr103

121. Tsao D, Diatchenko L, Dokholyan NV. Structural mechanism of S-adenosyl methionine binding to catechol O-methyltransferase. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e24287. PubMed doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024287

122. Strous RD, Ritsner MS, Adler S, et al. Improvement of aggressive behavior and quality of life impairment following S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM-e) augmentation in schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009;19(1):14-22. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.08.004

123. Tang KL, Antshel KM, Fremont WP, et al. Behavioral and psychiatric phenotypes in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2015;36(8):639-650. PubMed doi:10.1097/DBP.0000000000000210

124. Green T, Steingart L, Frisch A, et al. The feasibility and safety of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) for the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2012;119(11):1417-1423. PubMed doi:10.1007/s00702-012-0831-x

125. Hedges DW, Brown BL, Shwalb DA. A direct comparison of effect sizes from the clinical global impression-improvement scale to effect sizes from other rating scales in controlled trials of adult social anxiety disorder. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2009;24(1):35-40. PubMed doi:10.1002/hup.989

126. Agricola R, Dalla Verde G, Urani R, Di Palma C, Giorgetti V. S-adenosyl-L-methionine in the treatment of major depression complicating chronic alcoholism. Current Therapeutic Research. 1994;55:83-92. doi:10.1016/S0011-393X(05)80080-3

127. Russo AL, Monaco M, Pani A, Fontanari D. Efficacy of s-adenosyl-l-methionine in relieving psychologic distress associated with detoxification in opiate abusers. Current Therapeutic Research. 1994;55:905-913. doi:10.1016/S0011-393X(05)80580-6

128. Frezza M, Centini G, Cammareri G, et al. S-adenosylmethionine for the treatment of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: results of a controlled clinical trial. Hepatogastroenterology. 1990;37(suppl 2):122-125. PubMed

129. Friedel HA, Goa KL, Benfield P. S-adenosyl-L-methionine: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential in liver dysfunction and affective disorders in relation to its physiological role in cell metabolism. Drugs. 1989;38(3):389-416. PubMed doi:10.2165/00003495-198938030-00004

130. Lieber CS. Role of S-adenosyl-L-methionine in the treatment of liver diseases. J Hepatol. 1999;30(6):1155-1159. PubMed doi:10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80274-8

131. Mato JM, Cámara J, Fernández de Paz J, et al. S-adenosylmethionine in alcoholic liver cirrhosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. J Hepatol. 1999;30(6):1081-1089. PubMed doi:10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80263-3

132. Milkiewicz P, Mills CO, Roma MG, et al. Tauroursodeoxycholate and S-adenosyl-L-methionine exert an additive ameliorating effect on taurolithocholate-induced cholestasis: a study in isolated rat hepatocyte couplets. Hepatology. 1999;29(2):471-476. PubMed doi:10.1002/hep.510290215

133. Testino G, Leone S, Ansaldi F, et al. Silymarin and S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe): two promising pharmacological agents in case of chronic alcoholic hepathopathy: a review and a point of view. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2013;59(4):341-356. PubMed

134. Reefhuis J, Devine O, Friedman JM, et al; National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Specific SSRIs and birth defects: Bayesian analysis to interpret new data in the context of previous reports. BMJ. 2015;351:h3190. PubMed doi:10.1136/bmj.h3190

135. Frezza M, Pozzato G, Chiesa L, et al. Reversal of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in women after high dose S-adenosyl-L-methionine administration. Hepatology. 1984;4(2):274-278. PubMed doi:10.1002/hep.1840040217

136. Sun QF, Ding JG, Wang XF, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous stronger neo-minophagen C and S-adenosyl-L-methionine in treatment of pregnant woman with chronic hepatitis B: a pilot study. Med Sci Monit. 2010;16(8):PR9-PR14. PubMed

137. Beuers U, Trauner M, Jansen P, et al. New paradigms in the treatment of hepatic cholestasis: from UDCA to FXR, PXR and beyond. J Hepatol. 2015;62(suppl):S25-S37. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.02.023

138. Zhou F, Gao B, Wang X, et al. Meta-analysis of ursodeoxycholic acid and S-adenosylmethionine for improving the outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2014;22(4):299-304. PubMed

139. Surtees R, Hyland K. A method for the measurement of S-adenosylmethionine in small volume samples of cerebrospinal fluid or brain using high-performance liquid chromatography-electrochemistry. Anal Biochem. 1989;181(2):331-335. PubMed doi:10.1016/0003-2697(89)90252-2

140. Iruela LM, Minguez L, Merino J, et al. Toxic interaction of S-adenosylmethionine and clomipramine. Am J Psychiatry. 1993;150(3):522. PubMed doi:10.1176/ajp.150.3.522b

141. Torta R, Zanalda E, Rocca P, et al. Inhibitory activity of s-adenosyl-l-methionine on serum gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase increase induced by psychodrugs and anticonvulsants. Current Therapeutic Research. 1988;44:144-159.

142. Gören JL, Stoll AL, Damico KE, et al. Bioavailability and lack of toxicity of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) in humans. Pharmacotherapy. 2004;24(11):1501-1507. PubMed doi:10.1592/phco.24.16.1501.50943